<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel>
    <title>SMARTech Collection: Space Systems Design Lab Technical Papers</title>
    <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/8331</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/15067" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14804" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14773" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14772" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/15067">
    <title>Survey of Global Optimization Methods for Low-Thrust, Multiple Asteroid Tour Missions</title>
    <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/15067</link>
    <description>Title: Survey of Global Optimization Methods for Low-Thrust, Multiple Asteroid Tour Missions
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Alemany, Kristina; Braun, Robert D.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Electric propulsion has recently become a viable option for robotic missions,&#xD;
enabling shorter flight times, fewer required planetary gravity assists, smaller&#xD;
launch vehicles, and/or larger payloads. Trajectory design of these missions&#xD;
often relies on local optimization of the low-thrust trajectories using starting&#xD;
points for departure and arrival dates and selection of gravitational swing-bys&#xD;
based on previous experience. Global optimization of a low-thrust trajectory&#xD;
with multiple targets and gravity assists, however, is a difficult problem, due to&#xD;
the multi-modality and large size of the design space. In choosing analysis&#xD;
techniques, there exists an important tradeoff between the accuracy of the results&#xD;
and computing time required. This paper presents the difficulty of solving this&#xD;
global optimization problem, using the design of a multiple asteroid tour mission&#xD;
as an example. Furthermore, this paper presents an overview of the methods&#xD;
available for both low-thrust trajectory optimization and global optimization,&#xD;
along with recent improvements made, and assesses their efficacy and&#xD;
applicability to solving a multiple target/multiple gravity assist problem.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: 2007 AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting January 2007, Sedona, Arizona.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14804">
    <title>Control Authority Network Analysis Applied to Lunar Outpost Deployment</title>
    <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14804</link>
    <description>Title: Control Authority Network Analysis Applied to Lunar Outpost Deployment
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Alemany, Kristina; Morse, Elisabeth L.; Easter, Robert W.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: In order to return humans to the Moon, the&#xD;
Constellation Program will be required to operate a complex&#xD;
network of humans and spacecraft in several locations. This&#xD;
requires an early look at how decision-making authority will&#xD;
be allocated and transferred between humans and&#xD;
computers, for each of the many decision steps required for&#xD;
the various mission phases. This paper presents an overview&#xD;
of such a control authority analysis, along with an example&#xD;
based upon a lunar outpost deployment scenario. The results&#xD;
illustrate how choosing an optimal control authority&#xD;
architecture can serve to significantly reduce overall&#xD;
mission risk, when applied early in the design process.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference&#xD;
March 2007, Big Sky, MT.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14773">
    <title>An Approximate Ablative Thermal Protection System Sizing Tool for Entry System Design</title>
    <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14773</link>
    <description>Title: An Approximate Ablative Thermal Protection System Sizing Tool for Entry System Design
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Dec, John A.; Braun, Robert D.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: A computer tool to perform entry vehicle ablative thermal protection systems sizing has&#xD;
been developed. Two options for calculating the thermal response are incorporated into the&#xD;
tool. One, an industry-standard, high-fidelity ablation and thermal response program was&#xD;
integrated into the tool, making use of simulated trajectory data to calculate its boundary&#xD;
conditions at the ablating surface. Second, an approximate method that uses heat of ablation&#xD;
data to estimate heat shield recession during entry has been coupled to a one-dimensional&#xD;
finite-difference calculation that calculates the in-depth thermal response. The in-depth&#xD;
solution accounts for material decomposition, but does not account for pyrolysis gas energy&#xD;
absorption through the material. Engineering correlations are used to estimate stagnationpoint&#xD;
convective and radiative heating as a function of time. The sizing tool calculates&#xD;
recovery enthalpy, wall enthalpy, surface pressure, and heat transfer coefficient.&#xD;
Verification of this tool is performed by comparison to past thermal protection system&#xD;
sizings for the Mars Pathfinder and Stardust entry systems and calculations are performed&#xD;
for an Apollo capsule entering the atmosphere at lunar and Mars return speeds.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Conference&#xD;
January 2006, Reno, NV.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14772">
    <title>Entry Descent and Landing Challenges of Human Mars Exploration</title>
    <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14772</link>
    <description>Title: Entry Descent and Landing Challenges of Human Mars Exploration
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Wells, Grant William; Lafleur, Jarret M.; Verges, Amanda; Manyapu, Kavya; Christian, John A., III; Lewis, Charity; Braun, Robert D.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Near-term capabilities for robotic spacecraft include a target of landing&#xD;
1 - 2 metric ton payloads with a precision of about 10 kilometers, at moderate&#xD;
altitude landing sites (as high as +2 km MOLA). While challenging, these&#xD;
capabilities are modest in comparison to the requirements for landing human&#xD;
crews on Mars. Human Mars exploration studies imply the capability to safely&#xD;
land 40 - 80 metric ton payloads with a precision of tens of meters, possibly at&#xD;
even higher altitudes. New entry, descent and landing challenges imposed by the&#xD;
large mass requirements of human Mars exploration include: (1) the potential&#xD;
need for aerocapture prior to entry, descent and landing and associated thermal&#xD;
protection strategies, (2) large aeroshell diameter requirements, (3) severe mass&#xD;
fraction restrictions, (4) rapid transition from the hypersonic entry mode to a&#xD;
descent and landing configuration, (5) the need for supersonic propulsion&#xD;
initiation, and (6) increased system reliability. This investigation explores the&#xD;
potential of extending robotic entry, descent and landing architectures to human&#xD;
missions and highlights the challenges of landing large payloads on the surface&#xD;
of Mars.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: 29th AAS Guidance and Control Conference&#xD;
February 2006, Breckenridge, CO.</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

