<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SMARTech Collection: SSEC05. Session D: Earth Spacecraft and Sensors</title>
    <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/8012</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Systems Engineering Principles Applied to Basic Research and Development</title>
      <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/8034</link>
      <description>Title: Systems Engineering Principles Applied to Basic Research and Development
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Anderson, Norman C.; Nolte, William
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Systems engineering principles and processes have grown out of the need to effectively&#xD;
manage complex programs, many of them for the acquisition of operational military&#xD;
systems. These multi-billion dollar programs truly benefit from the application of&#xD;
structured systems engineering principles, and the supporting processes have been finetuned&#xD;
to maximize their benefit in a requirements driven environment. Research and&#xD;
development efforts, on the other-hand, have typically avoided application of structured&#xD;
processes, primarily due to a perception that such structure inhibits the creative processes&#xD;
that are so crucial to the discovery and development of new technologies. This paper&#xD;
proposes that systems engineering principles and creative discovery are not mutually&#xD;
exclusive environments, and that, in fact, appropriately tailored systems engineering&#xD;
processes can enable and enhance scientific discovery. An example of this concept will&#xD;
be presented for the principles of risk management, including application to basic&#xD;
research, applied research and development, and technology demonstrations.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: This conference features the work of authors from: Georgia Tech’s Space Systems Design Lab, Aerospace Systems Design Lab, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Tech Research Institute; NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, Langley Research Center; and other aerospace industry and academic institutions</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tactical Satellite 3: Requirements Development for&#xD;
Responsive Space Missions</title>
      <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/8035</link>
      <description>Title: Tactical Satellite 3: Requirements Development for&#xD;
Responsive Space Missions
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Straight, Stanley D.; Davis, Thomas M.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The Department of Defense is embarking on a broad initiative to make its space programs&#xD;
more responsive. There are many different views of responsive space, but common&#xD;
tenets include no cost and schedule growth within space programs, and space capabilities&#xD;
delivered directly to the operational and tactical warfighter within a theater of war. The&#xD;
Tactical Satellite 3 (TacSat-3) mission success criteria are unique integration of program&#xD;
management objectives of cost and schedule and technical objectives. TacSat-3 will&#xD;
demonstrate a Hyperspectral Imaging capability direct to the tactical warfighter within 10&#xD;
minutes of a collection opportunity. Central to providing this capability direct to the&#xD;
warfighter is fielding it in a responsive manner. Responsiveness demands a program&#xD;
structure and system design where cost and schedule are primary over mission&#xD;
performance to some minimum level. To be successful, the TacSat-3 program has&#xD;
developed requirements and mission success criteria which intimately link the cost and&#xD;
schedule to all aspects of requirements. The fundamental basis is the development of&#xD;
mission success criteria which are measurable, but allow for sufficient flexibility to meet&#xD;
aggressive cost and schedule constraints. Several examples of requirements trades are&#xD;
given.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: This conference features the work of authors from: Georgia Tech’s Space Systems Design Lab, Aerospace Systems Design Lab, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Tech Research Institute; NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, Langley Research Center; and other aerospace industry and academic institutions</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XSS-10 Mission Results and Lessons Learned</title>
      <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/8036</link>
      <description>Title: XSS-10 Mission Results and Lessons Learned
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Davis, Thomas M.; Melanson, David
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The Air Force Research Laboratory established the Micro-Satellite Technology Development Program&#xD;
(XSS series of flight demonstrations) to leverage micro-satellite technologies with the aim of providing&#xD;
solutions to Air Force future space mission capabilities. XSS-10 was the first in this series and was&#xD;
intended to demonstrate key operational concepts and technologies relating to close-in satellite inspection&#xD;
operations. The XSS-10 program began in December 1997 and launched from Cape Canaveral on 29&#xD;
January 2003 attached to the second stage of a Delta II. Eleven orbits later the XSS-10 micro-sat ejected&#xD;
from the orbiting Delta second stage and successfully completed a brief series of semi-autonomous&#xD;
maneuver and inspection operations using the Delta second stage as the RSO. The mission objectives of&#xD;
XSS-10 were to demonstrate autonomous navigation, proximity operations, and inspection of a Resident&#xD;
Space Object (RSO). XSS-10, a 31 kilogram micro-satellite launched as a secondary on a Delta II&#xD;
expendable launch vehicle carrying a GPS satellite. XSS-10 was equipped with a visible camera, a star&#xD;
sensor, GPS receiver and a mini SGLS system, all specially built for this program. In addition, a visible&#xD;
camera was also mounted on the second stage to observe the release of the microsatellite and observe its&#xD;
maneuvers. The XSS-10 micro satellite was released from the Delta II second stage after the GPS satellite&#xD;
was released. Operating autonomously, on a preplanned course, XSS-10 performed its mission of&#xD;
navigating around the Delta II second stage. Autonomously navigating around the second stage, at&#xD;
preplanned positions, the microsatellite took images of the second stage and sent them back in real time.&#xD;
During these demonstrations, XSS-10 demonstrated responsive checkout of the microsatellite and all of&#xD;
its subsystems, autonomous navigation on a preplanned course and a variety of algorithms and mission&#xD;
operations that are critical for future mission operations. This paper will discuss the results of the mission&#xD;
and post mission analysis of the XSS-10 space flight.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: This conference features the work of authors from: Georgia Tech’s Space Systems Design Lab, Aerospace Systems Design Lab, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Tech Research Institute; NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, Langley Research Center; and other aerospace industry and academic institutions</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Design and Systems Engineering of AFRL's Demonstration and Sciences Experiment</title>
      <link>http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/8037</link>
      <description>Title: Design and Systems Engineering of AFRL's Demonstration and Sciences Experiment
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Cohen, Dan; Spanjers, Gregory; Winter, James; Ginet, Gregory; Dichter, Bronislaw; Adler, Aaron; Tolliver, Martin
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Space Vehicles Directorate&#xD;
has developed the Demonstration and Science Experiments (DSX)&#xD;
mission to research technologies needed to significantly advance&#xD;
Department of Defense (DoD) capability to operate spacecraft in the&#xD;
harsh radiation environment of medium-earth orbits (MEO). The ability&#xD;
to operate effectively in the MEO environment significantly increases the&#xD;
DoD’s capability to field space systems that provide persistent global&#xD;
targeting-grade space surveillance, high-speed satellite-based&#xD;
communication, lower-cost GPS navigation, and protection from space&#xD;
weather on a responsive satellite platform. The three DSX experiments&#xD;
areas are:&#xD;
1. Wave Particle Interaction Experiment (WPIx): Researching the&#xD;
physics of very-low-frequency (VLF) transmissions in the&#xD;
magnetosphere and characterizing the feasibility of natural and manmade&#xD;
VLF waves to reduce space radiation;&#xD;
2. Space Weather Experiment (SWx): Characterizing and modeling the&#xD;
space radiation environment in MEO, an orbital regime attractive for&#xD;
future DoD and commercial missions;&#xD;
3. Space Environmental Effects (SFx): Researching and characterizing&#xD;
the space weather effects on spacecraft electronics and materials.&#xD;
DSX uses a modular design that allows for launch either as a primary&#xD;
satellite on a conventional launcher, such as a Minotaur, or as a&#xD;
secondary payload on a larger rocket, such as the Evolved Expendable&#xD;
Launch Vehicle (EELV).&#xD;
An overview of the DSX spacecraft design, requirements, systems&#xD;
engineering approach, bus subsystems, payload designs, and experiments&#xD;
will be described.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: This conference features the work of authors from: Georgia Tech’s Space Systems Design Lab, Aerospace Systems Design Lab, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Tech Research Institute; NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, Langley Research Center; and other aerospace industry and academic institutions</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

