A Knowledge Framework for Integrating Multiple Perspective in Decision-Centric Design

Show full item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1853/10522

Title: A Knowledge Framework for Integrating Multiple Perspective in Decision-Centric Design
Author: Mocko, Gregory Michael
Abstract: Problem: Engineering design decisions require the integration of information from multiple and disparate sources. However, this information is often independently created, limited to a single perspective, and not formally represented, thus making it difficult to formulate decisions. Hence, the primary challenge is the development of computational representations that facilitate the exchange of information for decision support. Approach: First, the scope of this research is limited to representing design decisions as compromise decision support problems (cDSP). To address this challenge, the primary hypothesis is that a formal language will enable the semantics of cDSP to be captured, thus providing a digital interface through which design information can be exchanged. The primary hypothesis is answered through the development of a description logic (DL) based formal language. The primary research question is addressed in four sub-questions. The first two research questions relate to the development of a vocabulary for representing the semantics of the cDSP. The first hypothesis used to answer this question is that formal information modeling techniques can be used to explicitly capture the semantics and structure of the cDSP. The second research question is focused on the realization of a computer-processible representation. The hypothesis used to answer this question is that DL can be used for developing computational-based representations. The third research question is related to the organization and retrieval of decision information. The hypothesis used to answer this question is DL reasoning algorithms can be used to support organization and retrieval. Validation: The formal language developed in this dissertation is theoretically and empirically validated using the validation square approach. Validation of the hypotheses is achieved by systematically building confidence through example problems. Examples include the cDSP construct, analysis support models, the design of a cantilever beam, and design of a structural fin array heat sink. Contributions: The primary contribution from this dissertation is a formal language for capturing the semantics of cDSPs and analysis support models comprised of: (1) a systematic methodology for decision formulation, (2) a cDSP vocabulary, (3) a graphical information model, and (4) a DL-based representation. The components, collectively, provide a means for exchanging cDSP information.
Type: Dissertation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1853/10522
Date: 2006-04-11
Publisher: Georgia Institute of Technology
Subject: Multi-objective decision making
Ontology development
Decision-centric design
Simulation-based design
Decision-based design
Design analysis integration
Information modeling
Information modeling
Decision support systems
Engineering design Computer simulation
Department: Mechanical Engineering
Advisor: Committee Co-Chair: David W. Rosen; Committee Co-Chair: Farrokh Mistree; Committee Member: Chris Paredis; Committee Member: Janet K. Allen; Committee Member: Leon McGinnis; Committee Member: Nelson Baker
Degree: Ph.D.

Items in SMARTech are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
mocko_gregory_200605_phd.pdf 3.153Mb PDF View/ Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record