• Login
    View Item 
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Liberal Arts - Ivan Allen College (IAC)
    • School of Public Policy
    • School of Public Policy Working Papers
    • View Item
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Liberal Arts - Ivan Allen College (IAC)
    • School of Public Policy
    • School of Public Policy Working Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    For Money or Glory?: Commercialization, Competition and Secrecy in the Entrepreneurial University

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    wp34.pdf (353.5Kb)
    Date
    2008-02-18
    Author
    Hong, Wei
    Walsh, John P.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Scholars have grown concerned that the commercialization of academic science is increasing secrecy at the expense of cooperation and information sharing. Using data from comparable surveys of academic scientists in three fields (experimental biology, mathematics and physics), we test whether scientists have become more competitive and more secretive over the last 30 years. We also use the recent survey to test a multivariate model of the effects of scientific competition and commercialization (patenting, industry funding and industry collaboration) on scientific secrecy. We find that secrecy has increased, and has increased particularly for experimental biologists. Only 13% of experimental biologists in 1998 felt safe discussing their ongoing research with all others doing similar work. Our multivariate analysis shows that this secrecy is most related to concerns about being anticipated (scientific competition). We find that patenting is associated with increased secrecy among mathematicians and physicists, but not for experimental biologists. We find that industry funding is associated with more secrecy, while industry collaboration is associated with less secrecy, across fields. Our results suggest that the recent concern over increasing scientific secrecy has merit. However, this increased secrecy seems to result from a combination of increasing commercial linkages and increased pressures from scientific competition. Our research highlights the central role that scientists’ competition for priority plays in the system of science and that, while such competition spurs effort, it also produces negative effects that recent trends toward commercialization of academic science seem to be exacerbating.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1853/23032
    Collections
    • School of Public Policy Working Papers [70]

    Browse

    All of SMARTechCommunities & CollectionsDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My SMARTech

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics
    facebook instagram twitter youtube
    • My Account
    • Contact us
    • Directory
    • Campus Map
    • Support/Give
    • Library Accessibility
      • About SMARTech
      • SMARTech Terms of Use
    Georgia Tech Library266 4th Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30332
    404.894.4500
    • Emergency Information
    • Legal and Privacy Information
    • Human Trafficking Notice
    • Accessibility
    • Accountability
    • Accreditation
    • Employment
    © 2020 Georgia Institute of Technology