Details and Fragments: Studio Process and Products

Show full item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1853/29144

Title: Details and Fragments: Studio Process and Products
Author: Wallick, Karl
Abstract: Architecture is not exactly whole. We remember instances, elements, and details. Rarely are the experiences and sensations in architectural experience comprehensive. The context of what we do as architects is always fragmentary even as it seeks to be resolved comprehensively. Rather than insisting on the totality of complete works, architecture could be better understood as an infinite matrix of detailed moments. These details can be disassembled from their constituent buildings and reconstructed as a universe of scale-less moments to be understood over a lifetime of observation, use, thinking, drawing, and construction. The purpose of this paper is to track the generative role of architectural fragments in tectonic discourse through the pedagogy of an early undergraduate architecture studio course. The Section Fragment studio uses sequential sectional division as a means of managing architectural detail development. This undergraduate studio is an attempt at structuring a studio exercise in the manner of Gregotti's techne. It desires to join the practical with the poetic through the development of tectonic architectural strategies, an understanding of the practical forces at work on and within architecture, and an awareness of modes of design within current practice. A lens of fragmentary focus is not dissimilar from the habits of contemporary practices with large task-specific teams and fast-track construction schedules. However, the opportunities for productive investigation within the tectonic fragment remain unexploited within the academy. In addition to comparing the types of knowledge generated by the fragment, we must ask: how does this knowledge compare to the tectonic questions pursued in practice? Furthermore, what are the qualities sought through this piecework method and do tectonic sensibilities provide sufficient linkage between various fragments at multiple scales? The studio examples will show that as a teaching tool, fragmentary tactics can be as useful as comprehensive tactics in addressing the multiple forces within an architectural project.
Description: This presentation was part of the session : Pedagogy: Procedures, Scaffolds, Strategies, Tactics 24th National Conference on the Beginning Design Student
Type: Proceedings
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1853/29144
Date: 2008-03
Contributor: University of Cincinnati. School of Architecture and Interior Design
Relation: 24NCBDS. Pedagogy: Procedures, Scaffolds, Strategies, Tactics
Publisher: Georgia Institute of Technology
Subject: Details
Sections
Design strategies
Undergraduate pedagogy

All materials in SMARTech are protected under U.S. Copyright Law and all rights are reserved, unless otherwise specifically indicated on or in the materials.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
9-232-1-PB.pdf 2.000Mb PDF View/ Open
9-71-1-PB.doc 4.132Mb Microsoft Word View/ Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record