Visualizing Ethical Controversies and Positions by Logical Argument Mapping (LAM) – A Manual

Show full item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Visualizing Ethical Controversies and Positions by Logical Argument Mapping (LAM) – A Manual
Author: Hoffmann, Michael H. G.
Abstract: Ethical decisions are often not clear-cut. Most of the time it is possible to argue for more than one "right thing to do," especially if there is a variety of ethical principles or conflicting arguments. In order both to understand those arguments and to participate in deliberation and communication on ethically relevant issues, we need some methods, tools, and the practical skills to use them. Such a method is Logical Argument Mapping (LAM). Its main functions are to facilitate the structuring of complex knowledge areas and belief systems, and to stimulate reflection and creativity. This manual describes the rules, the mapping conventions, and the procedure of Logical Argument Mapping. It describes the processes of argument construction and evaluation; the development of classifications that are necessary to structure a problem field; the integration of objections, questions, comments, and supporting data; and suggestions for the revision and improvements of argumentations. For these purposes, it provides lists of argument schemes, typology schemes, conflict schemes, and argument revision schemes.
Type: Working Paper
Date: 2009-05
Contributor: Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Public Policy
Relation: School of Public Policy Working Papers ; 50
Publisher: Georgia Institute of Technology
Subject: Logical argument mapping
Ethical decisions
Conflicting arguments
Argumentation theory

All materials in SMARTech are protected under U.S. Copyright Law and all rights are reserved, unless otherwise specifically indicated on or in the materials.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
wp50.pdf 6.463Mb PDF View/ Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record