• Login
    View Item 
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Sciences (CoS)
    • School of Biological Sciences
    • School of Biology Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Sciences (CoS)
    • School of Biological Sciences
    • School of Biology Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Chemical defense in the seaweed Dictyopteris delicatula: differential effects against reef fishes and amphipods

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    1988_meps_001.pdf (840.4Kb)
    Date
    1988-09-21
    Author
    Hay, Mark E.
    Duffy, J. Emmett
    Fenical, William
    Gustafson, Kirk
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Many seaweeds produce chemicals that deter feedlng by fishes and sea urchins. A growing body of evidence suggests that small, relatively immobile herbivores (mesograzers) such as amphpods, polychaetes, and ascoglossan gastropods are often unaffected by these compounds and may preferentially consume seaweeds that are chemically defended from fishes. We tested this hypothesis by examining the responses of reef fishes and amphipods to a mutture of 2 C,, hydrocarbons, &ctyopterenes A and B, produced by the Canbbean brown alga D~ctyopteris delicatula. This alga was intermediate in preference for reef fishes, and the dictyopterenes reduced fish grazing by a significant 40 %. In contrast, D. delicatula was highly preferred by a muted-species group of amphipods and the dlctyopterenes had no effect on their feeding Despite the tendency for mesograzers to selectively consume some seaweeds that are chemically deterrent to fishes, true specialization by these or other marine herbivores appears to be rare in companson with terrestnal systems. Plant-dwelling amphipods at our study site in the Grenadine Islands were found on, and consumed a variety of, macrophytes; they were not restrict~velys pecialized to D. delicatula. Many terrestnal insects are very specialized feeders, sequester toxins from theu food plants, and use these as duect defenses against predation. In contrast, sequestenng of seaweed toxlns by marine mesograzers appears to be relahvely rare. However, the indirect advantage of llving on seaweeds that are not eaten by fishes may be considerable. We hypothesize that mesograzers living on plants chemically defended from fishes wlll experience less predation than those living on plants preferred by fishes.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1853/34246
    Collections
    • School of Biology Faculty Publications [227]

    Browse

    All of SMARTechCommunities & CollectionsDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My SMARTech

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics
    facebook instagram twitter youtube
    • My Account
    • Contact us
    • Directory
    • Campus Map
    • Support/Give
    • Library Accessibility
      • About SMARTech
      • SMARTech Terms of Use
    Georgia Tech Library266 4th Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30332
    404.894.4500
    • Emergency Information
    • Legal and Privacy Information
    • Human Trafficking Notice
    • Accessibility
    • Accountability
    • Accreditation
    • Employment
    © 2020 Georgia Institute of Technology