Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarx, Matten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-10T20:12:52Z
dc.date.available2012-02-10T20:12:52Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/42600
dc.descriptionAtlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2011en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research introduces a methodology that combines analysis of cited literature and cited patents to explore differences and similarities between nano-biosensor (NBS) science and technology.The analysis of cited literature aims to determine which disciplines (subject categories) are closely related to NBS science, while the analysis of cited patents aims to establish which sub-fields within technology (IPCs International Patent Classes) and science (subject categories) are closely related to NBS technology.en_US
dc.publisherGeorgia Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesACSIP11. Early Career Postersen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual property protectionen_US
dc.subjectCited literatureen_US
dc.subjectCited patentsen_US
dc.subjectNano-biosensor science and technologyen_US
dc.subjectSubject categoriesen_US
dc.subjectInternational patent classesen_US
dc.titleHow does the enforcement of intellectual property protection influence innovation and entrepreneurship?en_US
dc.typeText
dc.contributor.corporatenameMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.type.genreProceedings


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record