dc.contributor.author | Marx, Matt | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-10T20:12:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-10T20:12:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-09-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1853/42600 | |
dc.description | Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2011 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This research introduces a methodology that combines analysis of cited literature and cited patents to explore differences and similarities between nano-biosensor (NBS) science and technology.The analysis of cited literature aims to determine which disciplines (subject categories) are closely related to NBS science, while the analysis of cited patents aims to establish which sub-fields within technology (IPCs International Patent Classes) and science (subject categories) are closely related to NBS technology. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Georgia Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ACSIP11. Early Career Posters | en_US |
dc.subject | Intellectual property protection | en_US |
dc.subject | Cited literature | en_US |
dc.subject | Cited patents | en_US |
dc.subject | Nano-biosensor science and technology | en_US |
dc.subject | Subject categories | en_US |
dc.subject | International patent classes | en_US |
dc.title | How does the enforcement of intellectual property protection influence innovation and entrepreneurship? | en_US |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.type.genre | Proceedings | |