Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHutchison-Krupat, Jeremyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-17T19:21:54Z
dc.date.available2012-02-17T19:21:54Z
dc.date.issued2011-11-02en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/42831
dc.description.abstractThis thesis addresses important operational aspects relating to fundamental components of any successfully executed NPD strategy: the processes, incentives and structure of decision rights that should be implemented given the objectives and capabilities of the firm. The first chapter outlines when a firm might prefer to compensate members of a NPD project team either, as individuals (e.g. based on their functional contribution to overall value) or as a team (e.g. based on the overall profit generated). We find that neither team nor individual based compensation is preferred for all types of projects. Specifically, when there is higher uncertainty, the firm can benefit by employing team-based compensation. We discuss the implications of our findings towards the firm's ability to pursue different types of projects. In Chapter 3, we look at the strategic resource allocation processes that are employed by firms in order to decide whether NPD initiatives get funded or not. We find that there is not a "one size fits all" resource allocation process that all firms should employ. Furthermore,we extend this finding by further by providing a rationale explaining why even a single firm could benefit by employing multiple processes internal to the firm. Finally, in Chapter 4, we empirically explore how key managerial levers of the firm (i.e. incentives, tolerance for failure, and project management structure) affect an individual's propensity to invest in a project. Our analysis brings forth several under-explored and novel aspects. We examine how multiple managerial levers work in concert with one another (revealing interactions that, to our knowledge, have not been exposed). We also recognize an important aspect of most (if not all) NPD contexts: the probability of success is strongly tied to the level of resources that are invested.en_US
dc.publisherGeorgia Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational processesen_US
dc.subjectInnovation strategyen_US
dc.subjectNew Product Developmenten_US
dc.subjectOrganizational structureen_US
dc.subjectResource allocation processen_US
dc.subject.lcshNew products
dc.subject.lcshCreative ability in business
dc.subject.lcshOrganizational effectiveness
dc.subject.lcshResource allocation
dc.titleResource allocation, incentives and organizational structure for collaborative, cross-functional new product developmenten_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.description.degreePhDen_US
dc.contributor.departmentManagementen_US
dc.description.advisorCommittee Chair: Stylianos Kavadias; Committee Member: Beril Toktay; Committee Member: Cheryl Gaimon; Committee Member: Raul Chao; Committee Member: Vinod Singhalen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record