dc.contributor.author | Brooks, Douglas Antwonne | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Yu-ping | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Howard, Ayanna M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-18T20:31:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-18T20:31:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | D. Brooks, Y-P. Chen, A. Howard, “Simulation versus Embodied Agents: Does either induce better human adherence to physical therapy exercise?” IEEE Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome, Italy, June 2012. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-4577-1199-2 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2155-1774 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1853/48464 | |
dc.description | ©2012 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works. | en_US |
dc.description | Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome, Italy, June 2012. | en_US |
dc.description | DOI: 10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290714 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This research investigates proper movement correlation as well as the overall perception of human subjects’ interaction with a simulated agent and an embodied agent in a physical therapeutic scenario. Using computer vision techniques coupled with the Microsoft Kinect to quantify reaching kinematics, correlation was assessed by aliging movements with a Vicon Motion Capture System as well as determining how well the specific exercises were mimicked. The results indicate that this approach is a viable alternative to Motion Capturing Systems for assessing certain movements during therapy. The results also indicate that there is some dependence on the use of an embodied agent as opposed to a simulated agent when assessing adherence. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Georgia Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.subject | Computer vision | en_US |
dc.subject | Human adherence | en_US |
dc.subject | Image segmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Kinematics | en_US |
dc.subject | Microsoft Kinect | en_US |
dc.subject | Motion capturing systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Physical therapy exercise | en_US |
dc.title | Simulation versus Embodied Agents: Does either induce better human adherence to physical therapy exercise? | en_US |
dc.type | Proceedings | en_US |
dc.type | Post-print | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. Human-Automation Systems Lab | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. Center for Robotics and Intelligent Machines | en_US |
dc.publisher.original | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290714 | |