Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPauletto, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Andy
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-08T05:13:35Z
dc.date.available2014-01-08T05:13:35Z
dc.date.issued2005-07
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of ICAD 05-Eleventh Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display, Limerick, Ireland, July 6-9, 2005. Ed. Eoin Brazil. International Community for Auditory Display, 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/50092
dc.descriptionPresented at the 11th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2005)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes an experiment to compare user understanding of complex data sets presented in two different modalities, a) in a visual spectrogram, and b) via audification. Many complex time-series data sets taken from helicopter flight recordings were presented to the test subjects in both modalities separately. The aim was to see if a key set of attributes (noise, repetitive elements, regular oscillations, discontinuities, and signal power) were discernable to the same degree in the different modalities. Statistically significant correlations were found for all attributes, which shows that audification can be used as an alternative to spectrograms for this type of analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherGeorgia Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.subjectAuditory displayen_US
dc.subjectAudio analysisen_US
dc.subjectVisual analysisen_US
dc.subjectTime-series data setsen_US
dc.titleA comparision of audio & visual analysis of complex time-series data setsen_US
dc.typeProceedingsen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversity of York. Electronics Department and Media Engineering Groupen_US
dc.publisher.originalInternational Community on Auditory Displayen_US
dc.embargo.termsnullen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record