• Login
    View Item 
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Engineering (CoE)
    • Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering (AE)
    • School of Aerospace Engineering Research Data
    • View Item
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Engineering (CoE)
    • Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering (AE)
    • School of Aerospace Engineering Research Data
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Decision Making with Incomplete Information Dataset

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    README_DecisionMakingIncompleteInfoSimulation_08282014.txt (15.55Kb)
    DecisionMakingIncompleteInfoSimulation_Part1_v2.csv (490.5Mb)
    DecisionMakingIncompleteInfoSimulation_Part2_v2.csv (491.2Mb)
    DecisionMakingIncompleteInfoSimulation_Part3_v2.csv (488.7Mb)
    DecisionMakingIncompleteInfoSimulation_Part4_v2.csv (489.5Mb)
    Counting_Effort_and_EIPs_DecisionMakingIncompleteInfoSimulation_07012014.pdf (211.5Kb)
    Date
    2014-07-09
    Author
    Feigh, Karen M.
    Canellas, Marc
    Chua, Zarrin K.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Decision makers are often required to make decisions with incomplete information. In order to design decision support systems (DSSs) utilizing restrictiveness and guidance to assist decision makers in these situations, it is essential to understand how certain decision making strategies are affected by incomplete information. This paper presents the results of a simulation measuring the accuracy and effort of take-the-best (TTB) and Tallying alongside two normative-rational decision making strategies, weighted-additive (WADD) and equal-weighting (EW) in scenarios with varying levels of total information, information imbalance, dispersion, and dominance. The results show there is significant variability in the effort requirements of heuristic strategies which may diminish the arguments for effort-accuracy trade-offs. Additionally, heuristic strategies were shown to be closest in accuracy to normative-rational strategies when context features matched dynamic decision settings. Ultimately, methods for restrictiveness and guidance based on trade-offs between total information and information imbalance were shown to enable reductions in total information that actually increased the accuracy of heuristics.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1853/52027
    Collections
    • School of Aerospace Engineering Research Data [7]

    Browse

    All of SMARTechCommunities & CollectionsDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My SMARTech

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics
    • About
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Emergency Information
    • Legal & Privacy Information
    • Accessibility
    • Accountability
    • Accreditation
    • Employment
    • Login
    Georgia Tech

    © Georgia Institute of Technology

    • About
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Emergency Information
    • Legal & Privacy Information
    • Accessibility
    • Accountability
    • Accreditation
    • Employment
    • Login
    Georgia Tech

    © Georgia Institute of Technology