dc.contributor.author | Ockman, Joan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-12T19:40:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-12T19:40:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-03-31 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1853/58088 | |
dc.description | Presented on March 31, 2017 at the 2017 Spring Symposium on Architecture, Phantasmagoria, and the Culture of Contemporary Capitalism in the Architecture Library, Architecture West Building, College of Design at Georgia Tech. | en_US |
dc.description | Session One | en_US |
dc.description | Joan Ockman is Distinguished Senior
Lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania
School of Design and Visiting Professor at
Cooper Union School of Architecture. An
architecture educator, historian, writer, and
editor, she has edited Architecture Culture
1943-1968, The Pragmatist Imagination, and
Out of Ground Zero. She is currently
completing a collection of essays titled
Architecture Among Other Things, to be
published next year by Actar. | en_US |
dc.description | Runtime: 26:29 minutes | |
dc.description.abstract | Once upon a time, in the days when modern
architecture was young, circulation through
a building was primarily a functional
problem. By the mid-twentieth century,
when the monument building morphed into
the spectacle-building, the circulation system
began to take on aesthetic implications of its
own and to become a central feature of a
building’s architectural identity. Think of Wright’s Guggenheim Museum or Saarinen’s
TWA Terminal. Of course, Baroque
architects already appreciated the expressive
potential of dynamic scenography four
centuries ago. But today the mania for
circulation spaces manifest in cutting-edge
architecture goes well beyond formal
virtuosity. Escalators, ramps, elevators, stairs,
bridges, catwalks—these privileged elements
of contemporary buildings not only belong to
a form-making culture that at all costs
(figuratively and literally) wishes to avoid the
appearance of fixity, but emanate from the
very structure of the neocapitalist imaginary.
In this talk we attempt an allegorical reading
of architecture’s “culture of circulation.”
What are the implications of an architecture
that is about circulation? | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 26:29 minutes | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Georgia Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Architecture, Phantasmagoria, and the Culture of Contemporary Capitalism Symposium | en_US |
dc.subject | Architecture | en_US |
dc.subject | Circulation | en_US |
dc.title | Culture of Circulation | en_US |
dc.type | Lecture | en_US |
dc.type | Video | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. College of Design | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Architecture | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | University of Pennsylvania | en_US |