• Login
    View Item 
    •   SMARTech Home
    • Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations
    • Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   SMARTech Home
    • Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations
    • Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Cloud condensation nuclei spectra: measurement techniques and ambient sampling in the southeastern United States

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    LIN-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf (21.02Mb)
    Date
    2016-08-01
    Author
    Lin, Jack Jie
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Measurements of the ability of aerosols to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) continue to be necessary to improve our understanding of the interaction between aerosols and clouds. Hardware improvements to the Droplet Measurement Technologies CCN Counter in the form of an Arduino microcontroller and a mass flow controller (MFC) have increased the robustness and flexibility of CCN spectra measurements. The supersaturation generated during dynamic flow operation was comprehensively characterized. A set of calibration experiments and instrument model simulations were used to assess instrument performance for a wide range of operating conditions, including instrument pressure, flow rate waveform, and flow rate period for both laboratory and ambient sampling conditions. CCN spectra, along with aerosol size and composition, were measured aboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration WP-3D aircraft during the SENEX field campaign in the summer of 2013. Measured aerosol properties were evaluated against sim- ulations using the Community Atmosphere Model and Community Multi-scale Air Quality Model. Aerosol in the southeastern United States was found to mostly composed of organics, but the composition of Aitken mode aerosol was found to have hygroscopicity similar to pure inorganic compounds. Both models fail to capture key characteristics of the observed aerosol. In particular, both models largely underestimating the total aerosol number. Under typical observed updraft values, however, the resulting cloud droplet number is only underestimated by a factor of two. Using the sensitivities of cloud droplet number to relevant input parameters, it was determined that the primary driver of discrepancy between the cloud droplet number computed from the observed and modeled aerosol parameters is the total aerosol number.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1853/58599
    Collections
    • Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations [23877]
    • School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Theses and Dissertations [543]

    Browse

    All of SMARTechCommunities & CollectionsDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My SMARTech

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics
    facebook instagram twitter youtube
    • My Account
    • Contact us
    • Directory
    • Campus Map
    • Support/Give
    • Library Accessibility
      • About SMARTech
      • SMARTech Terms of Use
    Georgia Tech Library266 4th Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30332
    404.894.4500
    • Emergency Information
    • Legal and Privacy Information
    • Human Trafficking Notice
    • Accessibility
    • Accountability
    • Accreditation
    • Employment
    © 2020 Georgia Institute of Technology