Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAppel, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorClemens, Alison
dc.contributor.authorHagenmaier, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorMeyerson, Jessica
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T16:40:00Z
dc.date.available2017-11-13T16:40:00Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/58923
dc.descriptionFiles PARD_Anonymized_Individual_Survey_Responses.xlsx and PARD_Anonymized_Individual_Survey_Responses.csv include anonymized responses to the 2014-2015 survey. Files PARD_Cross_Tabulation_Survey_Responses.xlsx and PARD_Cross_Tabulation_Survey_Responses.csv include an aggregated summary of responses to the 2014-2015 survey. Files PARD_Anonymized_Interview_Data.xlsx and PARD_Anonymized_Interview_Data.csv include redacted transcripts of 2014-2015 interviews. Supporting documentation: PARD_Survey_Instrument.docx and PARD_Survey_Instrument.txt include the survey instrument. PARD_Interview_Protocol.docx and PARD_Interview_Protocol.txt include the interview protocol. PARD_Codebook.docx and PARD_Codebook.txt include codebook used to tag free text survey and interview data. PARD_2015_Preliminary_Report.docx and PARD_2015_Preliminary_Report.txt are the project preliminary report, published online in 2015, summarizing initial findings from survey and interviews and used to inform Hackfest and second phase of research.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn an effort to advance the professional discourse around establishing best practices for access to born-digital archival collections, we designed a multi-phase, mixed-methods initiative, begun in 2014, that aimed to identify gaps and challenges in existing access methods and identify plans for how cultural heritage organizations hoped to improve access practices in the future. Our study was structured in two main parts. Part I comprised a literature review on access to born-digital archival collections, a survey and interviews about how institutions were providing access to born-digital collections, and a preliminary report of our findings. In Part II, we used our findings from Part I to design and implement a participatory Born-Digital Access Hackfest. Throughout our research journey, we interrogated what it means to conduct research as reflexive practitioner-researchers in and of our field, examining our attitudes and assumptions and those of our profession, and exploring how our involvement with our study influenced and informed our research.en_US
dc.subjectArchivesen_US
dc.subjectAccessen_US
dc.subjectBorn-digitalen_US
dc.subjectParticipatory action researchen_US
dc.subjectResearch and developmenten_US
dc.titleParticipatory Archival Research and Development: The Born-Digital Access Initiative Dataseten_US
dc.typeDataseten_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameGeorgia Institute of Technology. Libraryen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameTemple University. Librariesen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameEducopia Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameYale University. Manuscripts and Archivesen_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record