• Login
    View Item 
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Design (CoD)
    • School of Architecture
    • School of Architecture Symposia
    • View Item
    •   SMARTech Home
    • College of Design (CoD)
    • School of Architecture
    • School of Architecture Symposia
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Systems Everywhere: On the Incorporation of the Vocabulary of Systems Sciences in Architectural Discourse during the Second Half of the 20th Century

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Proceeding Book_Michael Moynihan.pdf (179.9Kb)
    Date
    2021-02
    Author
    Moynihan, Michael
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Through a consideration of well-known architectural sources, this paper will take inventory of the divergent, contradictory, and sometimes productive ways architects and architectural writers came to rely on the language of systems sciences in the second half of the twentieth century. For example, in K. Michael Hays’ anthology Architecture Theory Since 1968, the word “system” appeared 640 times. Alberto Perez-Gomez used the word 51 times in his short introduction to Claude Perrault’s Ordonnance to explain methodological changes occurring in seventeenth century France. There are other examples, of course: What Denise Scott Brown and Robert Venturi intended to learn from—far more than Las Vegas or Levittown—were “communication systems;” Jane Jacobs used complexity theory; Christopher Alexander said the city is a system not a tree; and even John Turner, an architect best known for self-build housing in Peru, used Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety (more commonly known as the first law of cybernetics) to argue against corporate and state power. As Ludwig Von Bertalanffy said in his influential book General Systems Theory, “systems [were] everywhere.” In this paper, I will untangle this complicated encounter between architecture and information sciences in two ways. First, I will show how systems metaphors have been used as a conceptual tool to define what has been called “architectural autonomy.” This includes writers who created a systematic traceable relationship between organizational protocols of architectural form to define architecture as separate from culture, politics, or ideology. Second, I will show examples of how systems have been used as an operative tool for the designer; specifically, architects and city planners who used new sciences of control to solve large complex problems.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1853/64305
    http://dx.doi.org/10.35090/gatech/51
    Collections
    • School of Architecture Symposia [46]

    Browse

    All of SMARTechCommunities & CollectionsDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionDatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My SMARTech

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics
    facebook instagram twitter youtube
    • My Account
    • Contact us
    • Directory
    • Campus Map
    • Support/Give
    • Library Accessibility
      • About SMARTech
      • SMARTech Terms of Use
    Georgia Tech Library266 4th Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30332
    404.894.4500
    • Emergency Information
    • Legal and Privacy Information
    • Human Trafficking Notice
    • Accessibility
    • Accountability
    • Accreditation
    • Employment
    © 2020 Georgia Institute of Technology