Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBagdanov, Andyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Steveen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicolai, Claudiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSubirats, Immaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-11T20:50:02Z
dc.date.available2009-06-11T20:50:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-05en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/28417
dc.description4th International Conference on Open Repositoriesen_US
dc.descriptionThis presentation was part of the session : Conference Postersen_US
dc.description.abstractAn extensive evaluation of the Fedora Commons 3.0 and DSpace 1.5 digital document repository systems has been conducted. The evaluation aimed at selecting an open source software package that best satisfies the FAO Open Archive and FAO organizational requirements and the requirements for the storage, dissemination and preservation of documents and bibliographic metadata. Both repository systems were evaluated against thirty-two criteria chosen from nine core categories of requirements: community, security, functionality, integration, modularity, metadata, statistics and reports, preservation, and outputs. These criteria were selected with the merger of the FAODOC and FAO Corporate Document Repository (CDR) into the FAO Open Archive in mind.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationsen_US
dc.publisherGeorgia Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOR09. Conference Postersen_US
dc.subjectFedora Commonsen_US
dc.subjectDSpaceen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectCataloguingen_US
dc.subjectRepositoriesen_US
dc.titleFedora Commons 3.0 Versus DSpace 1.5 : Selecting an Enterprise-Grade Repository System for FAO of the United Nationsen_US
dc.typeProceedingsen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record