Theses and Dissertations Live: Oregon State University Libraries' ETD Workflow

Show full item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Theses and Dissertations Live: Oregon State University Libraries' ETD Workflow
Author: Kunda, Sue
Abstract: In July 2005, the Oregon State University Libraries (OSUL) began accepting electronic versions of student theses and dissertations via ScholarsArchive@OSU, the library's institutional repository (IR). By January 2007, all OSU graduate students were required to deposit their final research to the Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD) Collection in ScholarsArchive@OSU. OSU is one of sixteen members of the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations association to require deposit of all ETDs. Using the DSpace digital repository platform, the Oregon State University Graduate School and library staff coordinated efforts to provide a seamless submission process as well as a self-explanatory template for resource description. Students create and attach basic descriptive metadata for their research; the Graduate School validates the thesis or dissertation; library staff reviews the student-submitted metadata, ensures that name headings are authorized, and adds Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). Although the Graduate School and Library promote Open Access for T/Ds, the DSpace administration interface is used to restrict access to the OSU campus for a few T/Ds each year. A tickler is created - using the ILS - which reminds staff to enable access to individual T/Ds as the restriction period expires. DSpace automatically generates structural and administrative metadata. The library uses a modified version of MarcEdit, a homegrown cataloging utility, to map the DSpace Dublin Core metadata to MARC. During this process, the utility imports the metadata from the IR into the library online catalog and WorldCat. In 2008 OSUL began digitizing pre-2007 T/Ds as they are requested through ILL and other consortia lending agreements. This workflow is currently in flux as we grapple with policies and systems wedded to traditional standards. This presentation will: 1. Compare past processes and workflows for print T/Ds with the present workflow for ETDs; 2. Provide the rationale for changes; 3. Review the cost- and time-savings produced by the revised workflow; 4. Describe the metadata mapping utility that generates MARC records in the local online catalog and WorldCat from Dublin Core repository records; 5. Describe the pros and cons of using DSpace for ETDs; 6. Discuss the current and future workflows for adding pre-2007 T/Ds to ScholarsArchive@OSU.
Description: 4th International Conference on Open Repositories This presentation was part of the session : DSpace User Group Presentations Date: 2009-05-20 01:30 PM – 03:00 PM
Type: Proceedings
Date: 2009-05-20
Contributor: Oregon State University
Relation: OR09. DSpace User Group Presentations
Publisher: Georgia Institute of Technology
Subject: Electronic theses and dissertations

All materials in SMARTech are protected under U.S. Copyright Law and all rights are reserved, unless otherwise specifically indicated on or in the materials.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
154-505-1-PB.ppt 7.443Mb Microsoft PowerPoint View/ Open Power Point Presentation
154-506-1-PB.pdf 2.626Mb PDF View/ Open PDF Presentation

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record