Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCramer, Tomen_US
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorMcRae, Lynnen_US
dc.contributor.authorSigmon, Timen_US
dc.contributor.authorWayland, Rossen_US
dc.coverage.temporalDate: 2009-05-21 10:30 AM – 12:00 PM
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-11T20:52:29Z
dc.date.available2009-06-11T20:52:29Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-21en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/28451
dc.description4th International Conference on Open Repositoriesen_US
dc.descriptionThis presentation was part of the session : Fedora User Group Presentationsen_US
dc.descriptionDate: 2009-05-21 10:30 AM – 12:00 PM
dc.description.abstract"Lightweight workflow" is both an oxymoron, and a continual aspiration of the many stakeholders in the repository community. As part of the Hydra Project, the University of Hull, University of Virginia and Stanford University are collaboratively developing a reusable application framework that will sit on top of Fedora. Developing support for workflow (defined here as orchestrating multistep processes that may include human interaction) is integral to the project. The partners consciously chose to take three different paths in implementing and integrating workflow into the overall solution. This paper briefly details the three different workflow approaches the collaborators are taking, why they chose them, and the apparent pro's and cons of each.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJISCen_US
dc.publisherGeorgia Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOR09. Fedora User Group Presentationsen_US
dc.subjectWorkflowen_US
dc.subjectFedoraen_US
dc.subjectRepositoriesen_US
dc.subjectScholar's workbenchen_US
dc.titleCase Studies in Repository Workflows: Three Approachesen_US
dc.typeProceedingsen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameStanford Universityen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversity of Hullen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversity of Virginiaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record